Home   |    Employment Opportunities   |    Projects   |    Smart Growth Quiz   |    Search:    
Local
E-News Signup


Route 30 Master Plan


Home > News > Local News
Local News

<< Back

Expert: Health care too expensive, not effective

Date: 2/20/2013

Expert: Health care too expensive, not effective

By Kari Andren 

Published: Wednesday, February 20, 2013, 12:01 a.m.


While the new federal health care law is not perfect, America’s current health care system is too expensive and not effective enough, a national health care expert said on Tuesday during a town hall meeting at the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg.

The United States spends about $2.5 trillion annually on health care, about one-fifth of our economy, and more per person than countries in Europe, said Dr. Kent Bottles, a senior fellow at the Thomas Jefferson School of Population Health in Philadelphia.

“It’s costing too much money for the federal government and it’s costing individuals too much money,” Bottles said. “We don’t have the best health care in the world. We ranked 34th ... Obviously you can get great health care in the United States, but we don’t as a whole nation have really good quality outcomes when you measure them.”

Speaking to about 100 people who gathered for the town hall cosponsored by Excela Health, Bottles said that if the price of eggs increased as much as health care has since 1945, a dozen would cost $55, he said.

A gallon of milk would be $48 and a dozen oranges would cost $134.

Bottles said the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, is not a perfect law, but it’s an attempt to make coverage more affordable and accessible and reform the way health care providers are compensated.

He said he disagrees with Pennsylvania’s decision to let the federal government run the insurance marketplaces set to come online by January 2014 rather than let the state tailor it to fit local needs.

And he said Gov. Tom Corbett made a mistake when he announced earlier this month that he will not expand eligibility for Medicaid, a joint state and federal insurance program for low-income people, even though the federal government would foot the majority of the bill.

Bottles said by expanding eligibility, about 500,000 uninsured people could have been covered. Although it would cost the state $2.8 billion, the federal government would have sent $37.8 billion for the expanded coverage.

“In Ohio, Gov. John Kasich -- he is not a flaming liberal ... he looked at the same thing and said, %91I can’t turn it down. It’s too good a deal for me to turn down.’”

Bottle answered several questions.

Q How will consumers be affected by the new law?

A If you’re on Medicare, there won’t be many changes and your benefits can’t be cut. If you have employer-provided insurance or are on another government-paid plan, you won’t see many changes unless your employer decides to stop offering coverage and you have to shop for insurance in the new marketplaces. The challenge really is getting the 18 million young adults without insurance to obtain it because if they’re not in the risk pool, the whole system won’t work economically.


Read more: http://triblive.com/news/westmoreland/3512356-74/care-health-law#ixzz2LUvT9B9Z 
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter %7C triblive on Facebook

Web Design by Nauticom Internet Services, Pittsburgh PA
Copyright by SGPWC, any reproduction is prohibited